heiher wrote: > Overall this seems fine, thanks! > > But I'm not sure if reporting a more generic "the model attribute is not > supported on this target" for non-LoongArch would be better: it doesn't give > the false impression that the target doesn't support the specified code model.
In my opinion I think this is better. I put it in a separate commit so we can easily revert it if someone thinks otherwise. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
