MaskRay wrote: > Did this change anything for the `scoped_atomic_compare_exchange_n` variant I > added recently?
I am not familiar with the scoped atomic xchg stuff, but this patch needs to update one `__hip_atomic_compare_exchange_weak` test: ``` flag = __hip_atomic_compare_exchange_weak(ptr, &val, desired, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL, __HIP_MEMORY_SCOPE_SINGLETHREAD); // expected-warning {{failure memory order argument to atomic operation is invalid}} ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74959 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits