github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff 29bd78b2f61e638f6c26bc417ae476754b91e985 0bcee977f95f87a5ccf7bc53d6cd0a5d9521d963 -- clang/test/ParserOpenACC/parse-clauses.c clang/include/clang/Basic/OpenACCKinds.h clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenACC.cpp clang/test/ParserOpenACC/parse-cache-construct.c clang/test/ParserOpenACC/parse-constructs.c clang/test/ParserOpenACC/parse-wait-construct.c clang/test/ParserOpenACC/unimplemented.c clang/test/ParserOpenACC/unimplemented.cpp `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenACC.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenACC.cpp index 2ad296e23e..50a8d85450 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenACC.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenACC.cpp @@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ OpenACCClauseKind getOpenACCClauseKind(Token Tok) { return OpenACCClauseKind::Invalid; return llvm::StringSwitch<OpenACCClauseKind>( - Tok.getIdentifierInfo()->getName()) - .Case("finalize", OpenACCClauseKind::Finalize) - .Case("if_present", OpenACCClauseKind::IfPresent) - .Case("seq", OpenACCClauseKind::Seq) - .Case("independent", OpenACCClauseKind::Independent) - .Case("auto", OpenACCClauseKind::Auto) - .Case("worker", OpenACCClauseKind::Worker) - .Case("vector", OpenACCClauseKind::Vector) - .Case("nohost", OpenACCClauseKind::NoHost) - .Default(OpenACCClauseKind::Invalid); + Tok.getIdentifierInfo()->getName()) + .Case("finalize", OpenACCClauseKind::Finalize) + .Case("if_present", OpenACCClauseKind::IfPresent) + .Case("seq", OpenACCClauseKind::Seq) + .Case("independent", OpenACCClauseKind::Independent) + .Case("auto", OpenACCClauseKind::Auto) + .Case("worker", OpenACCClauseKind::Worker) + .Case("vector", OpenACCClauseKind::Vector) + .Case("nohost", OpenACCClauseKind::NoHost) + .Default(OpenACCClauseKind::Invalid); } // Since 'atomic' is effectively a compound directive, this will decode the @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ bool ParseOpenACCClause(Parser &P) { // have to do this because 'SkipUntil' considers paren balancing, which isn't // what we want. void SkipUntilEndOfDirective(Parser &P) { - while(P.getCurToken().isNot(tok::annot_pragma_openacc_end)) + while (P.getCurToken().isNot(tok::annot_pragma_openacc_end)) P.ConsumeAnyToken(); } @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ void ParseOpenACCClauseList(Parser &P) { P.ConsumeToken(); FirstClause = false; - // Recovering from a bad clause is really difficult, so we just give up on error. + // Recovering from a bad clause is really difficult, so we just give up on + // error. if (ParseOpenACCClause(P)) { SkipUntilEndOfDirective(P); return; `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75052 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits