Fznamznon wrote: > The whole point of the shadowing warning is to avoid confusion about which > variable is actually used, which IMO could very well be the case here.
In the case that is being fixed, a field is not available in lambda's body without capturing this, so there is no such confusion and no shadowing, I think. I have a concern, that probably in case when `this` is actually captured, with current implementation there will be no warning as well. Should it be? gcc doesn't give a warning in both cases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
