github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 05420a17547e495f5748e9662150d6eb931e2c28
65707b837a8bb7283896d2c9d4933a17e02a20b9 -- clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/riscv-func-attr-target.c
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
index 184176c05d..1cce8fe5b2 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
@@ -309,12 +309,12 @@ bool RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
// negatives, and non-extension features. We need to preserve the later
// for correctness and want to preserve the former for consistency.
for (auto &Feature : NewFeaturesVec) {
- StringRef ExtName = Feature;
- assert(ExtName.size() > 1 && (ExtName[0] == '+' || ExtName[0] == '-'));
- ExtName = ExtName.drop_front(1); // Drop '+' or '-'
- if (!llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("+" + ExtName).str()) &&
- !llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("-" + ExtName).str()))
- ImpliedFeatures.push_back(Feature);
+ StringRef ExtName = Feature;
+ assert(ExtName.size() > 1 && (ExtName[0] == '+' || ExtName[0] == '-'));
+ ExtName = ExtName.drop_front(1); // Drop '+' or '-'
+ if (!llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("+" + ExtName).str()) &&
+ !llvm::is_contained(ImpliedFeatures, ("-" + ExtName).str()))
+ ImpliedFeatures.push_back(Feature);
}
return TargetInfo::initFeatureMap(Features, Diags, CPU, ImpliedFeatures);
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74889
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
