Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67...@github.com>
================
@@ -8938,6 +8957,11 @@ static void processTypeAttrs(TypeProcessingState &state,
QualType &type,
attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
break;
}
+ case ParsedAttr::AT_RequiresCapability: {
+ HandleRequiresCapabilityAttr(state, type, attr);
+ attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
+ break;
+ }
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Hmmmm, my intuition is that if we don't do this work now, we'll forever be
stuck with the current behavior where we don't diagnose pointer mismatches
because someone will rely on that continuing to work. So maybe we do want to do
this work now...
CC @erichkeane @aaronpuchert for opinions on whether we think this needs to
diagnose mismatches in the initial offering of it as a type attribute.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67095
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
