smeenai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208#564930, @EricWF wrote:
> Why do you want to build `libc++.so` with hidden visibility? What's wrong > with the existing way we build `libc++.so`? There's nothing wrong with the existing way, per se. I personally prefer hidden visibility semantics because I come from a Windows background and hidden visibility matches up well with DLL semantics, but the first section of https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility covers the advantages of hidden visibility pretty well. https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
