================
@@ -6334,8 +6334,8 @@ defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"version-loops-for-stri
PosFlag<SetTrue, [], [ClangOption], "Create unit-strided versions of loops">,
NegFlag<SetFalse, [], [ClangOption], "Do not create unit-strided loops
(default)">>;
defm alias_analysis : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f", "alias-analysis",
- PosFlag<SetTrue, [], [], "Pass alias information on to LLVM (default when
optimizing for speed)">,
- NegFlag<SetFalse, [], [], "Do not pass alias information on to LLVM (default
for unoptimized builds)">>;
+ PosFlag<SetTrue, [], [], "Pass alias information on to LLVM (default when
optimizing for speed). Overrides -O0.">,
+ NegFlag<SetFalse, [], [], "Do not pass alias information on to LLVM (default
for unoptimized builds). Overrides -O flags.">>;
} // let Visibility = [FC1Option, FlangOption]
----------------
tblah wrote:
Sure. Would it be okay to do that in a few weeks once the dust has settled from
enabling it by default? `-fno-alias-analysis` is an easy work around if any
problems show up
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73548
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
