Endilll wrote:

Your reasoning works until we have a crash that relies on `#embed` and/or its 
contents.

>From what I saw triaging old crashes, crash submitters are conscious if they 
>work with proprietary code they can't share even a fragment of, and not so 
>rarely reduce crash by themselves. I'm not fond of the idea on giving up on 
>every embed-related crash, because there is a risk (which I'm not estimating 
>high), that submitter forgot to check their otherwise open code for sensitive 
>information. This doesn't help us ironing out bugs in `#embed` implementation 
>in the long run.

One might say that additional back-and-forth with crash submitter is not too 
big of a deal, and it would be, if we haven't had ever-growing backlog of 
issues, some dating back more than a decade. Our existing workflow that allows 
people to drop attachments on us and forget about it has proven itself useful 
in the very long run. So I'd like us to keep this.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68620
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to