paulwalker-arm wrote: > The static functions renaming is going to produce a lot of noise but I guess > this is too late already... Shall we revert to keep the change minimal? > @nikic @paulwalker-arm WDYT ?
For my money the function's were originally named correctly and then erroneously changed to (a) diverge from the coding stand, and (b) unknowingly introduce a bug caused by the new naming. For both reasons I'm happy to revert to the original naming via this patch. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72979 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
