================
@@ -499,17 +473,64 @@ class DefineOutline : public Tweak {
HeaderUpdates = HeaderUpdates.merge(*DelInline);
}
- auto HeaderFE = Effect::fileEdit(SM, SM.getMainFileID(), HeaderUpdates);
- if (!HeaderFE)
- return HeaderFE.takeError();
-
- Effect->ApplyEdits.try_emplace(HeaderFE->first,
- std::move(HeaderFE->second));
+ if (SameFile) {
+ tooling::Replacements &R = Effect->ApplyEdits[*CCFile].Replacements;
+ R = R.merge(HeaderUpdates);
+ } else {
+ auto HeaderFE = Effect::fileEdit(SM, SM.getMainFileID(), HeaderUpdates);
+ if (!HeaderFE)
+ return HeaderFE.takeError();
+ Effect->ApplyEdits.try_emplace(HeaderFE->first,
+ std::move(HeaderFE->second));
+ }
return std::move(*Effect);
}
+ // Returns the most natural insertion point for \p QualifiedName in \p
+ // Contents. This currently cares about only the namespace proximity, but in
+ // feature it should also try to follow ordering of declarations. For
example,
+ // if decls come in order `foo, bar, baz` then this function should return
+ // some point between foo and baz for inserting bar.
+ llvm::Expected<InsertionPoint> getInsertionPoint(llvm::StringRef Contents,
+ const Selection &Sel) {
+ // If the definition goes to the same file and there is a namespace,
+ // we should (and, in the case of anonymous namespaces, need to)
+ // put the definition into the original namespace block.
+ // Within this constraint, the same considerations apply as in
+ // the FIXME below.
+ if (SameFile) {
+ if (auto *Namespace = Source->getEnclosingNamespaceContext()) {
----------------
kadircet wrote:
i think we should just fail the code action if enclosing namespace is nullptr,
something is definitely wrong with that file (and falling back to textual
matching feels suspicious).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69704
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
