================ @@ -11591,6 +11591,10 @@ def err_conflicting_aligned_options : Error < def err_coro_invalid_addr_of_label : Error< "the GNU address of label extension is not allowed in coroutines." >; +def err_coroutine_return_type : Error< ---------------- ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
The intention of `[[clang::coro_return_type]]` (and ` [[clang::coro_wrapper]]`) is to allow analyzer to recognize coroutines from the function signature. And if the users are able to downgrade the erros to a silent warning, then result of analyzing is basically out of order. Then `[[clang::coro_return_type]]` is basically meaningless. On the other hand, from the perspective of library writers, if we announce a class as `[[clang::coro_return_type]]` , we will assume it is an error if the users don't use it for a coroutine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71945 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
