AaronBallman wrote: > * @AaronBallman Having a nullptr init capture seems fishy, do we actually > mean to allow capturing vla by reference here?
That does seem fishy to me -- I would expect VLA to behave the same as a constant-size array in terms of what we capture. So I think we do want to capture the VLA by reference (that's how we behave for constant-sized arrays). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70962 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
