================ @@ -11591,6 +11591,10 @@ def err_conflicting_aligned_options : Error < def err_coro_invalid_addr_of_label : Error< "the GNU address of label extension is not allowed in coroutines." >; +def err_coroutine_return_type : Error< + "function returns a coroutine return type %0 but is neither a coroutine nor a coroutine wrapper; " ---------------- ilya-biryukov wrote:
NIT: should we mention the name of the `[[clang::coro_return_type]]` here? 'Coroutine return type' resembles the C++ standard a bit too too much, I am afraid this might cause confusion and people looking in the standard. Marking it clear this is an extension is probably useful here. E.g. we could add a note that adds the context: ```note: class 'Gen' has been marked with [[clang::coro_return_type]] here``` or add this to an error message ```error: function returns a type %0 marked with [[clang::coro_return_type]]``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71945 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
