owenca wrote: > However this doesn't address the second part of the linked issue (with the > `if`) does it?
Nope! That part is a duplicate of #64474. I was going to add a note in #71563 before merging this PR but now just saw that @FalcoGer closed the old issue and opened the new one, which is essentially the same. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71755 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
