ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > It was suggested to avoid "thin" and "fat" terminology (I started using it > with LTO as a precedent for the terms), but I suppose something more > descriptive could be selected.
Any suggestions? My english is not good, you know. > I'll also note that my prior usage was in reference to embedding transitive > BMI references in the BMI, not about including function definitions. May you elaborate on this? I don't understand since I feel they are unrelated. Are you saying: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62707? I feel they are orthogonal. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71622 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
