Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67...@github.com>
================
@@ -8938,6 +8957,11 @@ static void processTypeAttrs(TypeProcessingState &state,
QualType &type,
attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
break;
}
+ case ParsedAttr::AT_RequiresCapability: {
+ HandleRequiresCapabilityAttr(state, type, attr);
+ attr.setUsedAsTypeAttr();
+ break;
+ }
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Okay, maybe we do want to do this change separately. I think I was wrong about
modeling after this; I think we want it to be done like
`handleFunctionTypeAttr()` and `FUNCTION_TYPE_ATTRS_CASELIST` so that it
becomes part of the `FunctionType` itself. That's what would get us the
diagnostics on type mismatches (we look through `AttributedType` as sugar:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/28b7e281d4eaea0d5d56b1a4cf7a550be746a007/clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h#L4999)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67095
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
