ahatanak added inline comments.
> rsmith wrote in SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:4849 > Do we need to do this for conversion function names too? (Eg, `operator > C1<T>*`) I added a definition of "operator C1<T>*" and called it in C1::foo1. I didn't see any crashes or asserts. Calls to a destructor and a conversion function create different AST nodes (the former creates a MemberExpr and the latter creates a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr) and are transformed by different functions of TreeTransform. https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
