================
@@ -3553,6 +3553,56 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifier after constraint
+// checking.
+static Sema::TemplateDeductionResult
+tryInstantiateExplicitSpecifier(Sema &S, FunctionDecl *Specialization,
+ const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
&SubstArgs,
+ TemplateDeductionInfo &Info,
+ FunctionTemplateDecl *FunctionTemplate,
+ ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> DeducedArgs) {
+
+ const auto TryInstantiateExplicitSpecifierForSingleDecl =
+ [&](auto *ExplicitDecl) {
+ ExplicitSpecifier ExplicitSpecifier =
+ ExplicitDecl->getExplicitSpecifier();
+ Expr *const Expr = ExplicitSpecifier.getExpr();
+ if (!Expr) {
+ return Sema::TDK_Success;
+ }
+ if (!Expr->isValueDependent()) {
+ return Sema::TDK_Success;
+ }
+ // TemplateDeclInstantiator::InitFunctionInstantiation set the
+ // ActiveInstType to TemplateInstantiation, but we need
+ // to enable SFINAE when instantiating explicit specifier.
----------------
LYP951018 wrote:
Should the `set` here be past tense or present tense here?
`TemplateDeclInstantiator::InitFunctionInstantiation` is called before this
function and I think it should be past tense... I'm not good at English :(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
