================
@@ -9893,24 +9888,37 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::FormSVEBuiltinResult(Value
*Call) {
return Call;
}
-Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64SVEBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
- const CallExpr *E) {
+void CodeGenFunction::GetAArch64SMEProcessedOperands(
+ unsigned BuiltinID, const CallExpr *E, SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Ops,
+ SVETypeFlags TypeFlags) {
// Find out if any arguments are required to be integer constant expressions.
unsigned ICEArguments = 0;
ASTContext::GetBuiltinTypeError Error;
getContext().GetBuiltinType(BuiltinID, Error, &ICEArguments);
assert(Error == ASTContext::GE_None && "Should not codegen an error");
- llvm::Type *Ty = ConvertType(E->getType());
- if (BuiltinID >= SVE::BI__builtin_sve_reinterpret_s8_s8 &&
- BuiltinID <= SVE::BI__builtin_sve_reinterpret_f64_f64) {
- Value *Val = EmitScalarExpr(E->getArg(0));
- return EmitSVEReinterpret(Val, Ty);
- }
+ bool IsTupleGetOrSet = TypeFlags.isTupleSet() || TypeFlags.isTupleGet();
- llvm::SmallVector<Value *, 4> Ops;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = E->getNumArgs(); i != e; i++) {
- if ((ICEArguments & (1 << i)) == 0)
----------------
david-arm wrote:
Might be worth adding a comment explaining why we explicitly ignore tuple
get/set functions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69725
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
