VitaNuo added a comment.
Thanks!
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/tweaks/OrganizeImportsTests.cpp:35-41
+ {
+ R"cpp(
+#include "Te^stTU.h"
+)cpp",
+ true,
+ {}},
+ {"void foo(^) {}", false, {}}};
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> nit: you can use EXPECT_AVAILABLE and EXPECT_UNAVAILABLE directly for these
> two cases
I think it's the other way around. I can use the macros directly when I don't
need to pass specific requested action kinds, which is the last (third) case.
So it's probably not worth it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153769/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153769
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
