smeenai added a comment. In D108905#4654403 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654403>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> In D108905#4654393 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654393>, @smeenai wrote: > >> In D108905#2975712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#2975712>, @rsmith wrote: >> >>> No decision as yet, but so far it looks very likely that we'll settle on >>> the rule that exceptions cannot have potentially-throwing destructors, and >>> that we should reject `throw`s of such types. I don't think that should be >>> applied retroactively to C++98, though, because destructors were not >>> implicitly non-throwing back then. >> >> Were there any updates here? This seems like a useful change for us, and I >> was wondering if it could be unblocked now. > > What @rsmith talked about is in the standard-wise. I mean, if you feel this > is useful, it is possible to add an compiler option to enable this. I've > filed an issue to track this: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57375. My plan was to make this > happen this year. Yup, an option to enable this would be great for us. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
