github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff b858309ddc977d5e70de54f3fa3888915b5fbc0c
96f6b90ed4a70430f94eab2d9ca317dd8367022a --
clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git
a/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
b/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
index 676a491a4304..c11e726fe855 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ using namespace clang;
namespace {
// Check to ensure that bitfield initializers are visited.
-class BitfieldInitializerVisitor : public
ExpectedLocationVisitor<BitfieldInitializerVisitor> {
+class BitfieldInitializerVisitor
+ : public ExpectedLocationVisitor<BitfieldInitializerVisitor> {
public:
bool VisitIntegerLiteral(IntegerLiteral *IL) {
Match(std::to_string(IL->getValue().getSExtValue()), IL->getLocation());
@@ -24,11 +25,10 @@ public:
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, BitfieldInitializerIsVisited) {
BitfieldInitializerVisitor Visitor;
- Visitor.ExpectMatch("123", 2, 15);
- EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
- "struct S {\n"
- " int x : 8 = 123;\n"
- "};\n"));
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("123", 2, 15);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver("struct S {\n"
+ " int x : 8 = 123;\n"
+ "};\n"));
}
} // end anonymous namespace
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69557
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
