mstorsjo added inline comments.
> majnemer wrote in ms-volatile-arm.c:2 > You don't need -fms-volatile. Well, originally, the point was to clarify that these volatile stores end up without atomic semantics, regardless of whether -volatile:ms has been specified. The original version of this patch (with an inline implementation in intrin.h, just using a normal volatile pointer) wouldn't pass this test, but would pass if I remove this option. But if you prefer, I can leave it out. https://reviews.llvm.org/D24986 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
