================
@@ -444,6 +486,29 @@ DeviceTy::getTgtPtrBegin(void *HstPtrBegin, int64_t Size, 
bool UpdateRefCount,
          LR.TPR.getEntry()->dynRefCountToStr().c_str(), DynRefCountAction,
          LR.TPR.getEntry()->holdRefCountToStr().c_str(), HoldRefCountAction);
     LR.TPR.TargetPointer = (void *)TP;
+
+    // If this entry is not marked as being host pointer (the way the
+    // implementation works today this is never true, mistake?) then we
+    // have to check if this is a host pointer or not. This is a host pointer
+    // if the host address matches the target address.
+    if ((PM->RTLs.RequiresFlags & OMP_REQ_UNIFIED_SHARED_MEMORY) &&
+        !LR.TPR.Flags.IsHostPointer) {
+      // If addresses match it means that we are dealing with a host pointer
+      // which has to be marked as one and present flag reset:
+      if (LR.TPR.getEntry()->TgtPtrBegin == LR.TPR.getEntry()->HstPtrBegin) {
+        LR.TPR.Flags.IsPresent = false;
----------------
carlobertolli wrote:

Again, still odd: do we not always use getTargetPointer to add a new entry and 
before calling getTgtPtrBegin? Again, it might be that I do not understand how 
these APIs are used. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69005
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to