================ @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -show-encoding --mattr=+v,+xsfvqmaccqoq,+xsfvqmaccdod %s \ +# RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-ENCODING,CHECK-INST +# RUN: not llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -show-encoding %s 2>&1 \ +# RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-ERROR +# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -filetype=obj --mattr=+v,+xsfvqmaccqoq,+xsfvqmaccdod %s \ +# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d --mattr=+v,+xsfvqmaccqoq,+xsfvqmaccdod - \ +# RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-INST +# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -filetype=obj --mattr=+v,+xsfvqmaccqoq,+xsfvqmaccdod %s \ +# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNKNOWN + +sf.vqmaccu.2x8x2 v8, v4, v20 ---------------- eopXD wrote:
>From intuition I would say the motivation to mask a matrix multiplication may >not be strong? To split matrixes, tiling are done. So a masked version is >probably not needed. (This is my own personal guess though. Not a math library >expert here to back this up with experience. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68295 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
