rikhuijzer wrote: > [...] I am a bit afraid of the burden of having to maintain what is > essentially a third GEP representation.
Thanks for the explanation @zero9178. I am affraid I do not fully understand your reasoning (most likely due to a lack of knowledge on my side). However, it sounds very reasonable to me! So before I spend more time on the code, shall I rewrite this PR to throw a clear error from `GEPOp::verify` for the incorrect representation? Then we can close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63832. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68136 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
