rsmith added inline comments. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp:137-138 @@ -136,1 +136,4 @@ + // Disallow aliases to available_externally because available_externally + // will not be there in the end to allow the creation of the alias (PR30341). + // FIXME: An extern template instantiation will create functions with ---------------- Instead of this, I'd just say:
> available_externally definitions aren't real definitions, so we cannot create > an alias to one. or similar. It doesn't seem necessary or relevant to reference a particular PR here. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp:140-142 @@ +139,5 @@ + // FIXME: An extern template instantiation will create functions with + // linkage "AvailableExternally". In libc++, some classes also define + // members with attribute "AlwaysInline" and expect no reference to + // be generated. It is desirable to reenable this optimisation after + // corresponding LLVM changes. ---------------- It's not clear what this comment about `AlwaysInline` is referring to, since the code does not mention that. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp:142-143 @@ +141,4 @@ + // members with attribute "AlwaysInline" and expect no reference to + // be generated. It is desirable to reenable this optimisation after + // corresponding LLVM changes. + if (TargetLinkage == llvm::GlobalValue::AvailableExternallyLinkage) ---------------- What "corresponding LLVM changes" are you expecting here? It seems to be fundamental to aliases that they can only denote definitions. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp:170 @@ -159,9 +169,3 @@ if (llvm::GlobalValue::isDiscardableIfUnused(Linkage) && - (TargetLinkage != llvm::GlobalValue::AvailableExternallyLinkage || - !TargetDecl.getDecl()->hasAttr<AlwaysInlineAttr>())) { - // FIXME: An extern template instantiation will create functions with - // linkage "AvailableExternally". In libc++, some classes also define - // members with attribute "AlwaysInline" and expect no reference to - // be generated. It is desirable to reenable this optimisation after - // corresponding LLVM changes. + !TargetDecl.getDecl()->hasAttr<AlwaysInlineAttr>()) { addReplacement(MangledName, Aliasee); ---------------- Did you mean to change the behavior here? For non-`available_externally` functions, we never used to care whether they're `always_inline`. Why do we care now? https://reviews.llvm.org/D24682 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits