================
@@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ def fgpu_inline_threshold_EQ : Joined<["-"], 
"fgpu-inline-threshold=">,
 def fgpu_sanitize : Flag<["-"], "fgpu-sanitize">, Group<f_Group>,
   HelpText<"Enable sanitizer for supported offloading devices">;
 def fno_gpu_sanitize : Flag<["-"], "fno-gpu-sanitize">, Group<f_Group>;
+
+def foffload_compress : Flag<["-"], "foffload-compress">,
----------------
yxsamliu wrote:

The convention is to introduce a generic option which works for a specific 
offloading language, and the help message indicates which languages are 
supported. It is not feasible to support a feature in all offloading languages 
at once by one developer since a developer is usually only familiar with one 
offloading language. Once a feature is introduced for one offloading language, 
it can be extended or adopted by other offloading languages. This is better 
than each offloading language introducing an individual option for the same 
purpose.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67162
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to