aaron.ballman added a reviewer: erichkeane.
aaron.ballman added a comment.

I don't have a whole lot of opinions on the attribute itself (I'm not super 
familiar with BPF), but did spot some things to do on the Clang side. This will 
also need reviewers for the LLVM changes -- any ideas on who usually reviews 
BPF-related changes in LLVM?



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:7597-7604
 
+static void handleBPFPreserveStaticOffsetAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
+                                              const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+  auto *Rec = cast<RecordDecl>(D);
+  Rec->addAttr(::new (S.Context) BPFPreserveStaticOffsetAttr(S.Context, AL));
+}
+
----------------



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:8871
+  case ParsedAttr::AT_BPFPreserveStaticOffset:
+    handleBPFPreserveStaticOffsetAttr(S, D, AL);
+    break;
----------------



================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/bpf-attr-preserve-static-offset.c:1
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -ast-dump -triple bpf-pc-linux-gnu %s | 
FileCheck %s
+
----------------
You should also add a `-verify` test that verifies we diagnose applying the 
attribute to something other than a structure or union, accepts no arguments, 
is diagnosed on a non-BPF target, etc to ensure we've got correct diagnostic 
behavior.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133361/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133361

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to