AaronBallman wrote:

> I think we're going to be stuck with 'warning-as-default-error' here, and let 
> compiler-rt and tests/etc opt-out. I realize that makes the error not as 
> effective, but it is really the one 'good' way for the 'implementation' in 
> this case to handle itself.

Yeah, having slept on it, I think I agree that warning-defaults-to-error is 
probably the best we can do here. I think I will treat `init_priority` the same 
way so all three attributes have consistent priority handling.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67360
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to