orcguru wrote: > Also, is it intentional that we combined the patch to enable local-dynamic in > clang within this patch? Just wondering since I thought I saw a separate > patch for the clang portion before (unless I am mistaken).
Yes, I have to combine all changes into a monolithic patch, similar reason as mentioned by Kai. Otherwise those smaller patches will have to be serialized, review and commit one-by-one. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66316 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
