================
@@ -1798,11 +1798,24 @@ def ArmMveStrictPolymorphism : TypeAttr,
TargetSpecificAttr<TargetARM> {
let Documentation = [ArmMveStrictPolymorphismDocs];
}
-def NoUniqueAddress : InheritableAttr, TargetSpecificAttr<TargetItaniumCXXABI>
{
- let Spellings = [CXX11<"", "no_unique_address", 201803>];
+def NoUniqueAddress : InheritableAttr {
+ let Subjects = SubjectList<[NonBitField], ErrorDiag>;
+ // No spellings because instances of this attribute are created by
+ // MSNoUniqueAddress and ItaniumNoUniqueAddress
+ let Spellings = [];
+ let Documentation = [InternalOnly];
+}
+
+def MSNoUniqueAddress : InheritableAttr,
TargetSpecificAttr<TargetMicrosoftCXXABI> {
let Subjects = SubjectList<[NonBitField], ErrorDiag>;
+ let Spellings = [CXX11<"msvc", "no_unique_address", 201803>];
+ let Documentation = [MSNoUniqueAddressDocs];
+}
+
+def ItaniumNoUniqueAddress : InheritableAttr,
TargetSpecificAttr<TargetItaniumCXXABI> {
----------------
amykhuang wrote:
Yeah, that makes sense; would it be better to name it "NoUniqueAddress" and
then name the "parent" attribute something like "NoUniqueAddressGroup"?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67199
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
