mgorny marked an inline comment as done. mgorny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24903#551890, @rmaprath wrote:
> When the `<cfoo>` headers where split into `<cfoo>` and `<foo.h>` headers in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D12747, we have left out `<cstdint>` and `<ctime>`. > I was going to put up a patch to fix this but couldn't get to it. It's good > that you are adding `<stdint.h>`, perhaps you can follow what was done in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D12747 and repeat the same for `<cstdint>`? > > You will also need a test for the new header, https://reviews.llvm.org/D12747 > has examples. I see that libcxx already has a pretty complete test for stdint.h. After consulting the standard, I've shamelessly copied the C part of synopsis to my stdint.h. https://reviews.llvm.org/D24903 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
