vitalybuka added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24693#550119, @ahatanak wrote:
> Thank you for the great example! I can now see this patch does fix > mis-compiles. > > There are probably other lifetime bugs you'll see when the code being > compiled includes gotos that jump past variable declarations, including the > one here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/050066.html. Do > you think you can extend the approach taken in this patch to prevent > mis-compiles for those too? This probably can be extended to this case, but I'd prefer to do this in separate patch later. > Also, rather than removing the intrinsics altogether, have you considered > making changes to IRGen to insert them to different locations or insert extra > lifetime.starts? I can see how to insert starts, e.g. on every label which bypass declaration, but I am not sure where to put ends. Probably it's possible, but patch will be significantly more complicated. I'd prefer to do so only when needed. This is infrequent usecase, so it's probably not worth of additional complexity. https://reviews.llvm.org/D24693 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
