sstwcw wrote:

> Another thing is that we need to get this fixed really soon. Another (safer 
> and actually preferred) alternative is to revert the change and address 
> problematic use cases before recommitting it, but I'm also fine with 
> forward-fixing this as long as fixes don't require major changes that have 
> potential for other problems to appear.

I see.  In that case, I added #66372.

However, why do you need it fixed so soon?  The latest release is
version 16.  And the string breaking stuff isn't even in the version 17
branch.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66168
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to