zahiraam added a comment. In D151834#4644373 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4644373>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D151834#4643925 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4643925>, @uabelho wrote: > >> Hi @zahiraam , >> >> I have a couple of downstream testcases that fail with this patch. >> Before >> >> > clang bbi-86364.c -lm -O3 >> > ./a.out >> >> passed but with the patch the assert in the program fails: >> >> a.out: bbi-86364.c:9: int main(): Assertion `(*__errno_location ()) == 33' >> failed. >> >> Is this as expected? >> >> F29200339: bbi-86364.c <https://reviews.llvm.org/F29200339> > > This seems unexpected to me and it seems to relate to whether you include > errno.h or not: https://godbolt.org/z/EPWzazx9r -- @zahiraam do you have > ideas as to what's going on? I haven't looked at it as I saw that the comment has been deleted. Let me look into it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits