================
@@ -415,9 +443,55 @@ class ASTNodeTraverser
if (!T->isSugared())
Visit(T->getPattern());
}
+ void VisitAutoType(const AutoType *T) {
+ for (const auto &Arg : T->getTypeConstraintArguments())
+ Visit(Arg);
+ }
// FIXME: ElaboratedType, DependentNameType,
// DependentTemplateSpecializationType, ObjCObjectType
+ // For TypeLocs, we automatically visit the inner type loc (pointee type
etc).
+ // We must explicitly visit other lexically-nested nodes.
+ void VisitFunctionProtoTypeLoc(FunctionProtoTypeLoc TL) {
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Do we need to explicitly visit the return type? (It would be good to have a
test case with a function declaration with a regular return type and one with a
trailing return type, and probably another test with a lambda expression. Also
good to have a test case involving a function template.)
What about things like exception specifications? e.g., `void func() throw(int);`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65484
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
