tuliom added a comment. In D159115#4640388 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D159115#4640388>, @mgorny wrote:
> I'm sorry, by "new" you mean the version with `uintptr_t` or the original as > well? Both with `uintptr_t` as well as `unsigned long long`. In D159115#4641721 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D159115#4641721>, @mgorny wrote: > I've tested right now (as of 3398744a6106c83993611bd3c5e79ec6b94417dc > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG3398744a6106c83993611bd3c5e79ec6b94417dc>) and > all clang tests passed for me on Gentoo/ppc64le. Did Gentoo switch the default long double to IEEE 128-bit floating point? If not, that could explain why this new code is broken on ppc64le. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D159115/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D159115 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
