aaron.ballman added a comment. In D159312#4633989 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D159312#4633989>, @dalias wrote:
> I don't understand the motivation of trying to match musl's definition here. > musl explicitly **does not support** using a compiler-provided `stddef.h` or > other standard headers. If it's getting included, this is a symption of an > include order problem that needs to be fixed, and getting an error telling > you that is preferable. Oh! Thank you for that information, that's really good to know! Our stddef.h is one of the few headers we provide that doesn't do an `include_next` to get to the system library header if one is available; I wonder if that's a contributing factor? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D159312/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D159312 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
