aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unused-private-field.cpp:291-292
+enum [[maybe_unused]] MaybeUnusedEnum {};
+typedef int MaybeUnusedTypedef [[maybe_unused]];
+class C {
+ MaybeUnusedClass c; // no-warning
----------------
hans wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Let's try one more thing:
> > ```
> > template <typename Ty, typename Uy>
> > class C2 {
> > Ty c; // no-warning
> > Uy d; // warning
> > };
> >
> > class [[maybe_unused]] Good {};
> > class Bad {};
> >
> > C2<Good, Bad> c;
> > ```
> The `!FD->getParent()->isDependentContext()` condition prevents the warning
> from firing on either `C2<>::c` or `d`. (It seems that was there from the
> beginning:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0baec549a3f49d8c04a0092917f758cc89ef238d#diff-9ced4fa47ee2b9c03b6996ce89a1d131c0f5b71013993bc582209f50d5e934daR1649)
Hmmm. I think that's intended to ensure we don't diagnose before we've
instantiated the template, but once we instantiate with `C2<Good, Bad> c;`, the
field decl is no longer in a dependent context and we should still diagnose
when instantiating, right?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D159083/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D159083
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
