jyu2 added a comment. Hi @rnk,
Thank you so much for the suggestion. >> Before we do that, you should be able to delete the logic in >> CodeGenModule::getFunctionLinkage to handle inheriting constructor thunks. >> Your change should have the same effect. Can you do that, and check that it >> passes tests? If we do that, we're don't have to accumulate extra special >> case code, we've just moved the special case code earlier, up from codegen >> into the earlier linkage calculation. Yes, you are right. I remove the code in CodeGenModule.cpp, the test passes for check-clang. ================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ms-inheriting-ctor.cpp:41 + +// CHECK-LABEL: define internal noundef ptr @"??0?$B@_N@@QEAA@AEBVF@@AEBUA@@@Z"(ptr noundef nonnull returned align 1 dereferenceable(1) %this, ptr noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) %0, ptr noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) %1) unnamed_addr #2 align 2 +// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr dso_local noundef ptr @"??0?$c@_NUb@@@@QEAA@AEBVF@@AEBUA@@@Z"(ptr noundef nonnull returned align 1 dereferenceable(1) %this, ptr noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) %p1, ptr noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) %d) unnamed_addr #2 comdat align 2 ---------------- rnk wrote: > To make this less fragile, can you come up with a way to use `CHECK-NOT: > comdat` since that's the key thing we're testing for here? You will need some > subsequent anchor like `entry:` or something else. Thanks. I changed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D158538/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D158538 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits