FlashSheridan added a comment.

A couple of low-priority suggestions from Pylint 3 at 326 and 95:



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/clang-tidy-diff.py:95
 
-def start_workers(max_tasks, tidy_caller, task_queue, lock, timeout):
+def start_workers(max_tasks, tidy_caller, task_queue, lock, timeout, 
failed_files):
     for _ in range(max_tasks):
----------------
Pylint 3 says > “[R0913(too-many-arguments), start_workers] Too many arguments 
(6/5),” 

I think you just pushed start_workers() over the edge; personally, I don’t 
think a rewrite to reduce the number of arguments would improve clarity.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/clang-tidy-diff.py:326
+    return_code = 0
+    if len(failed_files):
+        return_code = 1
----------------
Pylint 3 says: > [C1802(use-implicit-booleaness-not-len), main] Do not use 
len(SEQUENCE) without comparison to determine if a sequence is empty
  (I have no strong feelings.)




Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158929/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158929

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to