rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCleanup.cpp:882
if (!Scope.hasBranchThroughs() && !HasFixups && !HasFallthrough &&
- Scope.getNumBranchAfters() == 1) {
+ !getLangOpts().EHAsynch && Scope.getNumBranchAfters() == 1) {
assert(!BranchThroughDest || !IsActive);
----------------
This seems like it's only necessary when exiting a `__try` scope, but this
check affects all exits from C++ cleanup scopes. Is there a way to check if
there is an active try scope? When do we need to signal abnormal termination
via normal control flow?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158233/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158233
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
