hvdijk added a comment. In D86310#4596712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310#4596712>, @tmgross wrote:
> Is clang still doing something wrong? From my testing, it seems like clang > and GCC now agree with each other, I am not sure what would still be incorrect My understanding is that the code clang generates for `__int128` will still allow it to be passed half-in-register, half-in-memory, exactly what D158169 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158169> sets out to fix, because D158169 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158169> only fixes it for LLVM's `i128` which clang bypasses. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
