tbaeder added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Interp.cpp:241
bool CheckMutable(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Pointer &Ptr) {
- assert(Ptr.isLive() && "Pointer is not live");
if (!Ptr.isMutable()) {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I understand that we were hitting this assertion, but why is removing the
> assertion the correct approach? I thought it made sense to check for pointer
> liveness here.
I re-checked and I think I removed this only for testing and it should stay in.
The test succeeds like this.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152132/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152132
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
