ldionne added a comment. In D157227#4564817 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227#4564817>, @nikic wrote:
> Removing noundef makes no sense to me, because the return value is noundef > even under fno-exceptions. If we remove something, it should be the nonnull > attribute, because that's what's actually being violated. > > @ldionne Can you give us an ETA on D150610 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150610> > please? Do we need to introduce a workaround for this libcxx bug in clang, or > do you plan to fix this in the near future? I'll try to do this for LLVM 18, sorry that's just a complicated change. I would recommend not working around this in Clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
