jansvoboda11 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Option/Option.h:103
+ StringLiteral getSpelling() const {
+ assert(Info && "Must have a valid info!");
----------------
benlangmuir wrote:
> This could use a doc comment to differentiate it from other string
> representations.
>
> How does this compare with `Arg::getSpelling`? With `Arg`, IIUC the
> "spelling" is how it was actually written rather than a canonical form. That
> might be confusing if this one is canonical; so we should at least clearly
> document it or maybe put "canonical" in the API name?
You're right `Arg::getSpelling()` is the as-written prefix and name, while
`Option::getSpelling()` was the canonical prefix and name. I noticed there's
also `Option::getPrefixedName()` which used to return `std::string`. I decided
to reuse that and return `StringLiteral` instead. Thanks!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157029/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157029
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
