xen0n added a comment. In D155824#4530474 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824#4530474>, @SixWeining wrote:
> @xen0n Do you have any inputs? I think supporting these options can improve > compatibility with gcc (although there is no ScheduleModel difference among > currently supported processors) and I hope it can be merged into LLVM17. Sorry for the late reply (busy with rewriting the doc comments for D138135 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138135>). I'm in support of adding those flags, and for now I think defaulting to LA464 values would suffice. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
