dblaikie added a comment. In D153536#4521156 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536#4521156>, @hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> In D153536#4512897 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536#4512897>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> but at least at a first blush I can't reproduce the failures shown... > > @dblaikie, you //did// reproduce the issue with the members. Both entries > have DW_AT_decl_line 2 and DW_AT_data_member_location 0 (the second entry > should indicate DW_AT_decl_line 3 and DW_AT_data_member_location 4): > >> 0x0000002e: DW_TAG_structure_type >> DW_AT_calling_convention (DW_CC_pass_by_value) >> DW_AT_name ("t1") >> DW_AT_byte_size (0x08) >> DW_AT_decl_file >> ("/usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/scratch/unused_member.cpp") >> DW_AT_decl_line (1) >> >> 0x00000034: DW_TAG_member >> DW_AT_name ("_") >> DW_AT_type (0x00000047 "int") >> DW_AT_decl_file >> ("/usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/scratch/unused_member.cpp") >> DW_AT_decl_line (2) >> DW_AT_data_member_location (0x00) >> >> 0x0000003d: DW_TAG_member >> DW_AT_name ("_") >> DW_AT_type (0x00000047 "int") >> DW_AT_decl_file >> ("/usr/local/google/home/blaikie/dev/scratch/unused_member.cpp") >> DW_AT_decl_line (2) >> DW_AT_data_member_location (0x00) >> >> 0x00000046: NULL > > As for the block-scope case, I am still able to reproduce the issue (and also > your result that does not exhibit the issue). The key seems to be having the > `_`s on the same line. Ah, fair enough - probably easy enough for you to look for some kind of map with inadequate key material in CGDebugInfo somewhere, I'd guess... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
